Click on text below to see the vid

Test EVERY Cow in the Food Chain

Test EVERY Cow in the Food Chain
Like Other Countries Do

Monday, January 4, 2010

More Bad Beef Recalled : E. Coli / Midwest

Subject: PRO/AH/EDR> E. coli O157 - USA (09): tenderized, non-intact steak

> *****************************************************
> A ProMED-mail post
> ProMED-mail is a program of the
> International Society for Infectious Diseases
> [1]
> Date: Thu 24 Dec 2009
> Source: CNN [edited]
> A beef recall is under way in a half-dozen states involving possibly
> contaminated products from the Oklahoma company National Steak and
> Poultry, according to the firm and federal inspectors.
> The USA Agriculture Department officials said a cluster of illnesses
> involving the _E. coli_ [O157:H7] bacterium was reported in Colorado,
> Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota and Washington state. The cases
> then were linked with beef the Owasso, Oklahoma, company produced in
> October, prompting the government to direct a Class I recall,
> indicating the highest risk of illness if the products are consumed.
> On Thursday [24 Dec 2009], National Steak and Poultry began a
> voluntary recall of 248 000 pounds of beef products marketed under
> its name as well as under names that include Carino's Boneless Beef
> and Moe's Beef Steak. A consumer hotline at the company carries a
> recorded message noting "this is the 1st recall in our company's
> nearly 30-year history." National Steak and Poultry did not
> acknowledge any contaminationin its beef processing or packaging
> facilities, but the recording said the firm "will err on the side of
> being cautious" with the recall.
> [Byline: Paul Courson]
> --
> Communicated by:
> ProMED-mail
> *****
> [2]
> Date: Mon 28 Dec 2009
> Source: ABC News [edited]
> National Steak and Poultry is voluntarily recalling about 248 000
> pounds of beef it said might be contaminated with a strain of _E.
> coli_ [O157:H7]. The company said the meat could be linked to
> illnesses in 6 states.
> The Owasso-based company and the USA Agriculture Department announced
> the recall on Thursday [24 Dec 2009]. National Steak and Poultry says
> on its Web site the beef products "could potentially be implicated in
> an outbreak" of illnesses related to _E. coli_.
> The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service became aware of the
> problem while investigating a cluster of illnesses and determined
> there is an association between non-intact steaks, which have been
> blade tenderized prior to further processing, and illnesses in
> Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota and Washington.
> The products being recalled include various sizes of the company's
> "Boneless Beef Sirloin Steak," "Boneless Beef Tips," "Savory Sirloin
> Tips," "Bacon Wrapped Beef Fillet," "Beef Shoulder Marinated Tender
> Medallions," "75 percent Boneless Beef Trimmings," "Beef Trimmings"
> and "Beef Sirloin Philly Steak."
> Also being recalled are various sizes of "EGN Boneless Beef Sirloin
> Steak," "EGN Boneless Beef Sirloin Tri Tip Steak," "KRM Boneless Beef
> Sirloin Steak," "Carino's Boneless Beef Outside Skirt Steak,"
> "Carino's Boneless Beef Outside Skirt Steak Pieces" and "Moe's Beef
> Steak."
> National Steak and Poultry said the recalled products are in packages
> bearing a label with the establishment number "EST. 6010T" inside the
> USDA mark of inspection and packaging dates of "10/12/2009,"
> "10/13/2009," "10/14/2009," or "10/21/2009." The company said the
> products were shipped to restaurants nationwide.
> The company said in a statement that the recalled beef was produced
> at its Owasso facility. It said the recall is limited to beef
> products sold primarily to the Moe's, Carino's Italian Grill, and KRM
> restaurants in the 6 states.
> --
> Communicated by:
> ProMED-mail
> *****
> [3]
> Date: 30 Dec 2009
> Source: Washington Post [Edited]
> > 2902772.html>
> E. coli-tainted beef infects 21 people in 16 states
> ------------------------------------
> Twenty-one people in 16 states have been infected in recent days with
> a potentially lethal strain of E. coli bacteria, after consuming beef
> in restaurants supplied by the same Oklahoma meat company, federal
> officials said.
> The outbreak spurred the company, National Steak and Poultry, to
> voluntarily recall 248,000 pounds of beef Dec. 24. The products,
> which range from steaks to sirloin tips, were packaged in October and
> shipped to restaurants, hotels and institutions nationwide, according
> to the company.
> The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection
> Service has only a partial list of restaurants that received the
> potentially tainted beef, including two chains, Moe's and Carino's
> Italian Grill, primarily in the West and Midwest.
> The recall is considered a "class 1" or a "high health risk" by the
> USDA, which regulates the meat industry, because among the pathogens
> that can harm human health, E. coli O157:H7 is one of the most
> lethal. Even for those who survive, there can be long-term health
> effects.
> Nine of the 21 sickened have been hospitalized, the USDA reported.
> The department has identified cases in six states -- Colorado, Iowa,
> Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota and Washington
> The agency said the contamination appears to have begun with tainted
> beef used for chopped steak that was "co-mingled" with other products
> in the plant. Jerry Mande, the USDA's deputy undersecretary for food
> safety, said the investigation is continuing. A telephone message
> left for the company was not returned.
> The outbreak is considered by the Centers for Disease Control and
> Prevention, the agency that tracks national illness outbreaks, to be
> relatively small. But it is significant because it is at least the
> fourth associated with mechanically tenderized beef since 2000.
> Mechanical tenderization softens tough cuts of beef by hammering the
> meat with metal needles or blades that break up muscle fibers and
> connective tissue. It is often used to improve the tenderness of
> roasts and steaks that are cooked at a processing plant before being
> sent to restaurants. In the meat industry, it is referred to as
> "needled" meat.
> Consumer advocates say mechanical tenderization poses contamination
> risks in meats that are served rare, such as steaks, because it can
> bring bacteria from the surface of meat to the center of the cut. A
> rare steak may be cooked enough so that bacteria on the surface are
> killed but those inside the meat survive.
> "This is something that's been coming along. It's not an overnight
> problem," said Carol L. Tucker-Foreman of Consumer Federation of
> America, part of a coalition that wrote to Agriculture Secretary Tom
> Vilsack in June to express concern about mechanically tenderized
> meat. "The USDA has been looking at this for a long time. . . .
> People have proposed ways to address it and nothing was done about it
> in the Clinton administration, the Bush administration and now the
> Obama administration."
> At a minimum, the government should issue guidelines to consumers and
> the restaurant industry that specifically address mechanically
> tenderized meat, and the products should be labeled because consumers
> cannot detect whether a cut of meat has been "needled," she said.
> "Retailers should have to label mechanically tenderized meat and say
> 'Don't eat this product rare.' "
> Mande said the USDA agrees that the public needs better information
> about the risks of mechanically tenderized beef, and the agency is
> considering labeling and education efforts.
> But James H. Hodges, executive vice president of the American Meat
> Institute, said in a statement that mechanically tenderized beef
> carries no greater risk than other meat and that special labels are
> unnecessary.
> [Byline: Lyndsey Layton]
> --
> Communicated by:
> ProMED-mail
> [The following is a discussion regarding the issue of non-intact
> steaks and roasts, pieces of meat that have be tenderized by needle
> or blade which can introduce pathogens (especially _E. coli_ O157:H7)
> to the internal aspect of the meat where it may survive better than
> its "surface" cousins.
> In 1999, the United States Department of Agriculture's Food Safety
> and Inspection Service (FSIS)
> (
> asked the National Advisory Committee for Microbiological Criteria
> for Foods (NACMCF) whether non-intact, blade tenderized beef and beef
> roasts presented a greater risk to consumers from _E. coli_ 0157:H7
> compared to intact beef steaks if prepared similarly. Based on a
> Kansas State University Study, beef products mechanically tenderized
> or injected with marinade before purchasing can carry approximately 3
> to 4 percent of the surface bacteria to the inside of the beef
> product, meaning that there is a greater risk to consumers from _E.
> coli_.
> Since 2000, there have been 4 _E. coli_ outbreaks associated with
> non-intact beef steaks (Canada, Michigan, Colorado and Minnesota) and
> 2 outbreaks involving beef roasts. As a result, the FSIS published a
> notice in the May 26 Federal Register titled "HACCP Plan Reassessment
> for Mechanically Tenderized Beef Products." In this notice, FSIS
> asked each plant operator that mechanically tenderizes meat products
> to specifically consider in the annual reassessment of their HACCP
> plan the significance of these recent outbreaks as a hazard that is
> reasonably likely to occur.
> The FSIS also recommended these processors implement purchase
> specifications requiring the incoming product to be treated to reduce
> or eliminate _E. coli_ to an undetectable level or apply an approved
> antimicrobial to the meat. The FSIS noted it is considering requiring
> raw, mechanically tenderized beef products to be labeled showing it
> has undergone mechanical tenderization. In light of this newly
> identified risk to consumers' health, the Dairy and Food Protection
> Branch (Division of Environmental Health, Department of Environmental
> and Natural Resources) recommends the following changes to the
> handling of non-intact meat products:
> 1. All beef not labeled as intact and without buyer specifications to
> show that it is intact must be assumed to be a non-intact beef
> product based on the standard meat processing industry practices of
> pinning, tenderizing or injecting these products. This also includes
> comminuted beef steak (chopped, flaked, ground, minced, restructured
> or reformulated).
> 2. Cook non-intact beef products to a temperature of 155 degrees F as
> measured by a properly calibrated food thermometer as required by the
> FDA Food Code.
> 3. If you currently tenderize beef steaks or other beef products in
> your restaurant kitchen, please stop this practice.
> 4. Educate your staff about the identified risks of mechanically
> tenderized (non-intact) beef products.
> 5. When possible, notify consumers about the risk of getting _E.
> coli_ from mechanically tenderized (nonintact) beef steaks and roasts.
> The NACMCF research also showed that blade-tenderized steaks present
> no greater risk than intact steaks if oven-broiled to an internal
> temperature of 140 degrees F or above as measured by a food
> thermometer. In September 2002, the NCAMCF also found there was
> insufficient data to support the need for a labeling requirement to
> distinguish between intact and non-intact beef. Since it is often
> impossible to visually tell in all cases whether a steak or roast has
> been mechanically tenderized or injected, it is recommended that
> these products be cooked to an internal temperature of 155 degrees F.
> Protect your customers by following the above guidelines until a
> labeling requirement or microbial treatment of non-intact beef
> products, or both, are required. - Mod.LL]
> [see also:
> E. coli O157 - USA (08): ground beef 20091103.3794
> E. coli O157 - USA (07): refrigerated cookie dough 20090710.2473
> E. coli O157 - USA (06): beef, recall, RFI 20090702.2389
> E. coli O157 - USA (05): refrigerated cookie dough, CDC 20090701.2381
> E. coli O157 - USA (04): refrigerated cookie dough 20090630.2371
> E. coli O157 - USA (03): beef, recall 20090629.2354
> E. coli O157 - USA (02): refrigerated cookie dough 20090623.2291
> E. coli O157 - USA: refrigerated cookie dough 20090619.2259
> 2008
> ---
> E. coli O157 - USA (09): (WA), susp. 20081021.3336
> E. coli O157 - USA (08): (CA), cooked beef 20081007.3181
> E. coli O157, university students - USA (06): California lettuce 20081015.3266
> E. coli O157, university students - USA: (MI) 20080922.2987
> E. coli O157 - USA (07): (MA) alert 20080811.2475
> E. coli O157 - USA: (OH, MI), unknown source 20080624.1947
> E. coli O157, lettuce - USA: (WA) 20080606.1807
> E. coli O157, restaurant - USA: (HI) 20080228.0811
> 2007
> ---
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate) (09) 20071126.3823
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate) (08): Canada 20071029.3511
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate) (04): 2nd manufacturer
> 20071007.3304
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate) (03): CDC report 20071003.3272
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate): alert, recall 20070927.3201
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (NY): alert, recall 20070926.3190
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (WA, OR): alert 20070830.2855
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (NY) 20070725.2387
> E. coli VTEC, prisoners - USA (CO) (02) 20070714.2263
> E. coli VTEC, prisoners - USA (CO): RFI 20070712.2236
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (west) (03): expanded recall 20070611.1902
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (west): recall 20070606.1831
> E. coli O157, ground beef - USA (multistate): recall 20070514.1532
> E. coli O157, steak - USA (PA): recall 20070426.1362
> E. coli O157, restaurant - USA (CA) (03) 20070410.1204
> E. coli O157, restaurant - USA (CA) 20070403.1131
> E. coli O157, spinach - USA (multistate): 2006, FDA report 20070326.1051
> E. coli O157, bagged salad greens - USA (multistate) 20070121.0288
> E. coli O157, lettuce - USA (multistate): 2006 20070112.0158]
> 2003
> ----
> E. coli O157, frozen steaks - USA (Midwest): recall 20030701.1617]
> .................................ll/ejp/lm
> *##########################################################*
> ************************************************************
> ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
> are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
> information, and of any statements or opinions based
> thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
> using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
> and its associated service providers shall not be held
> responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
> damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
> or archived material.
> ************************************************************
> Become a ProMED-mail Premium Subscriber at
> ************************************************************
> Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
> Send all items for posting to:
> (NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
> full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
> commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
> etc. to: For assistance from a
> human being send mail to:
> ############################################################
> ############################################################

No comments: