Click on text below to see the vid

Test EVERY Cow in the Food Chain

Test EVERY Cow in the Food Chain
Like Other Countries Do

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Vilsack (Czar,USDA) 2 Travel 2 Japan as Goodwill Ambassidor for Meat Industry

Challenges Linger As Japan Accepts Beef From U.S.
03/31/2010 11:12AM

Food Manufacturing reports Tom Vilsack’s comments Tuesday on the difficulty he’ll face in his continued efforts to persuade Japan to fully reopen its beef market to the U.S.

Japan had been the U.S.’ primary export market until they discontinued imports from the U.S.

Worries over food safety following the mad cow disease scare remain a key concern as Vilsack meets with Japanese officials. When asked about Tokyo’s control on U.S. beef imports Vilsack expects forward progress.

Tokyo closed imports from the U.S. following the first case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, mad cow disease, in 2003 but has recently allowed beef from cattle 20 months and younger. Under the initiative by President Obama’s administration, Vilsack begins a five day tour to Japan next Monday in efforts to double total U.S. exports over five years.

For more information click here.

Source: www.FoodManufacturing.com


Your comment has been sent successfully!

1 Comments


Revoltin1, RuralTown, USA, March 31, 2010 10:54

Antibiotics in Livestock Production Cause Drug Resistance in Humans;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-report-antibiotics-in-livestock.html

Mexican Pig Lagoons;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/03/smithfields-mexican-pig-lagoons-source.html

Pigs Possible Swine Flu Vectors;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/02/pigs-possible-swine-flu-vectors-new.html

Sick Pigs in Food Chain "A-OK" w/ USDA;
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/12/09/jvm.downer.pigs.cnn

Got Milk? Get Cancer;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/02/got-milk-get-cancer-monsanto-milk.html

Rethinking the Meat Guzzler;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/01/rethinking-meat-guzzler.html

Corporate Threats to Our Food Supply;
http://exposingfdanusda.blogspot.com/2010/01/corporate-threats-to-our-food-supply.html


Click on title above to go to the original article where you can leave a comment. Its simple and easy cause you dont even have to register;

http://www.cattlenetwork.com/Challenges-Linger-As-Japan-Accepts-Beef-From-U-S/2010-03-31/Article_HotTopics.aspx?oid=1031424

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Downer Pigs in Food Chain "Standard Procedure" Producers Say

Click on title above for another shocker from HSUS.

No matter what else people may have bad to say about HSUS,....you got to give credit where credit is due and give them a GREAT BIG THANKS for exposing this stuff.

Friday, March 26, 2010

EHV-1 outbreak in NJ prompts state officials to quarantine barns

Last Thursday, New Jersey resident Corinne Dean had trailered a horse home that she had just purchased from local Camelot Auction. As the horse came off the trailer, she was panting and shaking. Within moments, the horse staggered and fell. A veterinarian was called who examined the horse. The mare showed signs of shock, and her membranes were black; the diagnosis was bastard strangles/pneumonia. The horse was euthanized; there was no necroposy done.

On March 23, New Jersey State officials arrived at the Monmouth County farm of Rachel Sherman and examined two horses believed to be EHV-1 positive. According to the e-mail posted by Nancy Halpern DVM, State Veterinarian," one horse tested presumptively positive and three horses have been euthanized with clinical signs consistent with the neurological form of the disease." Two farms are presently under quarantine for 21 days; each time a new case is confirmed the clock starts from the beginning again.

Equine Herpesvirus Myeloencephalopathy is a neurological disease which damages the blood vessels in the brain and spinal cord. There are five alpha herpesvirus that infect horses ( EHV-1,2,3,4,5), but EHV-1 and EHV-4 are the most serious health risks for horses.

Information on EHV-1


Any horse can be a latent life-long carrier and not show any signs of the disease, but it can be reactivated by stress, strenuous exercise or even long distance transport. The disease can be prevalent and move very quickly from horse to horse at race tracks, competitions, vet clinics, auctions and feedlots. Infection can occur through horse to horse contact, use of tack, grooming, feed and water buckets or by shoes and clothing of any person having had contact with an EHV horse.

The following are common signs of EHV:

Fever
Decreased coordination
Urine dribbling
Loss of tail tone
Hind limb weakness
Leaning for balance
Lethargy
Unable to rise
To diagnose the virus the most effective ways are nasal swabs, blood collection to detect the virus by PCR assay or virus isolation, ( collected 2 to 3 weeks apart) or through the necropsy of the dead horse.

Treatment can include supportive intravenous, anti-inflammatory drugs, and the use of antibiotics for the treatment of the secondary bacterial infection. Antibiotics have no effect on the equine herpesvirus itself.

The best way to prevent the disease is to keep away from any horse or barn that EHV has been diagnosed, isolate the sick horse, do not share equipment and always practice bio-security by washing hands before touching any horses.

Owners should always check with their veterinarians for protocol and advice about vaccinations or preferred treatments.

Wellington Outbreak


In December, 2006 a group of horses that arrived in Wellington from the import station in New York were stabled in Wellington for several days. The horses had been imported from Europe, and one horse shipped to California died and was confirmed as having had EHV-1. There were 6 reported fatalities, but the community dealt with it by voluntary quarantines and stop-movement orders. Veterinarians had vaccinated and boostered more than 4000 horses in a 48 hour period.

Quarantine


According to the Merck Veterinary Manual, EHV-1 and EHV-4 are ubiquitous in horse populations. There is no particular season, age or geographic areas more prevalent than others, but the denser the horse population, the more likely there will be the spread of the disease. According to Jennifer Swanson, co-founder of Pure Thoughts Horse & Foal Rescue in Loxahatchee, quarantine is just part of life.

" We used to bring in foals and horses and never knew the condition they were coming in, so we always practiced strict quarantine practices with us and our volunteers. We kept the sick completely isolated from any other horses, kept their buckets away and used more bleach than the local stores could supply. I've quarantined for skin infections, respiratory, strangles and other issues until safe release was confirmed by our vets," Swanson explained.

Last week Swanson rescued 3 Florida Thoroughbreds at risk from a farm in Maine known to ship horses directly to slaughter. Dedicated to saving Florida Thoroughbreds through their newest division of Pure Thoughts, the Florida Thoroughbred Rehabilitation and Placement expanded the open door policy for Thoroughbreds horses who have been retired from Florida race tracks. The three horses identified as Heaven's Host, IIithyia, and Derby Trafaire will be heading to Florida once quarantine is over.

"Heaven's Host tested positive for EHV-4 and IIithyia has Influenza A; Derby Trafaire's bloodwork came back as negative, but we have Heaven's Host and IIithyia in isolation and quarantine in New Hampshire now until they are retested by PCR assay to ensure their recovery. Even after they get down here when they are finished with quarantine, we'll quarantine them again. You can never be too careful," stated Swanson.



http://www.examiner.com/x-25445-West-Palm-Beach-Horse-Rescue-Examiner~y2010m3d25-EHV1-outbreak-in-NJ-prompts-state-officials-to-quarantine-barns?#comments

From pasture to plate

The final leg in the quest to find out where your burger comes from

Amy Badry
Gauntlet Features

March 25, 2010

Last week we discussed the past and present of cattle ranching. With the consolidation of the meat packing industry, the prairie way of life has changed. The shifting cultural landscape in Alberta brings with it new and unforeseen social dilemmas. This week concerns hormone regulation and the future of cattle farming. Conventional and free range farmers discuss the controversy of growth hormones in cattle. Let's mooove on and take a look at the "udder" side of the story. To read last week's article, mosey on over here; http://thegauntlet.ca/story/14370

The Argument
Numerous American and international scientific studies insist that growth-promoting hormones are safe. Hormones stimulate growth by increasing the efficiency with which feed is converted into muscle. These scientists state the drugs are extensively tested and reviewed by the American Food and Drug Administration and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, who agree that the hormone level found in beef is minuscule and not harmful to humans. They also point out that the hormones injected are naturally occurring in plants and animals.

"The growth hormone is a small pill-like pellet that is implanted just behind an animal's ear," explained Clarence Knutson, a farmer from central Alberta who believes the hormones are safe. "There are meat inspectors who check to ensure our meat is good. The hormones don't affect the quality or safety of the meat."

Most beef sold in Canadian supermarkets is from cattle that have been implanted with growth-promoting hormones.

A partnership between the Government of Canada and the cattle industry promotes and educates producers about on-farm beef safety. All meat that goes to market is federally inspected by Hazards Analysis Critical Control Points through the Verified Beef Production initiative. According to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, HACCP ensures risks associated with the food supply and transmission of animal disease to humans are minimized when producing Alberta beef.

The other side of the argument states hormone residues in meat disrupts human hormone balance. These hormones are believed to cause development problems and interfere with the reproductive system.

"The European Union won't allow hormonally injected beef, but since our main customer is the States it doesn't really matter," said Max Foran, a University of Calgary professor.

Alberta Cattle Feeders board member Doug Price said the EU does not accept hormone injected beef as "a way of protecting their borders." In the last few months, the EU has lowered tariffs and opened the border for hormone-free North American cattle export.

The international scientific community is still concerned about the impact of hormone residue not only on human health, but also on the environment. The hormones pass through cattle and leave a residue in manure, which contaminates the soil and water. One study conducted in Pennsylvania on an aquatic ecosystem subjected to manure with hormone residue noticed changes in the gender and reproductive capacity of fish in the area.
To Beef Or Not To Beef
"There is a tremendous amount of ignorance about how beef is raised," said Foran. "The beef industry is battling attitudes."

A Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy scare in 2004, better known as mad cow disease, left the cattle industry in dire straits. After the discovery of a single case of BSE on a Canadian farm, the United States closed its border to Canadian beef.

"You went from getting $1,400 a cow to $300 a cow," said Knutson. "It is a little better now, but there [are] still misconceptions and fear about how you contract the disease. You have a better chance of jumping over a house than getting BSE."

For the past decade beef producers have been contesting the myths and misconceptions surrounding the industry. With BSE and media concern about red meat causing cancers and high cholesterol, more and more people are turning to vegetarian and vegan options.

Consumers have to be proactive in finding a good food source said Tanya Cole Lightfoot, a raw food enthusiast.

"People say organic food is so expensive, but where are your priorities? There are people who drive a Mercedes and say 'I can't afford organic.' But where are your values? You are voting with your dollar."

Price differences between organic meat and conventionally raised meat are a concern for many. One kilogram of organic beef tenderloin steak is about $63.93, compared to the $39.90 for a kilogram of the conventional Co-Op version.

Recent research shows no nutritional difference between organic and regular food. Lean beef raised in either a feedlot setting or on a pasture both provide high quality protein packed with zinc, B12 and other essential nutrients.

"The local produce manager at Safeway says the organic section has grown by 100 per cent in the last year," said Lightfoot.

But organic production is not necessarily environmentally sustainable food production. Beef produced in feedlots can be branded organic while small-scale farmers often have a difficult time obtaining organic certification despite their commitment to sustainable agriculture practices.
The Future
Change has to take place if the cattle industry is going to survive and be profitable, said Biggs.

"Change is difficult in agriculture for a lot of guys. The cattle industry still supports the factory-farming model. The biggest thing in agriculture today is money. Lots of guys can't afford to keep calves throughout the fall and are forced to sell them."

"We need to think outside the box. Change takes time and the average producer does not have enough money in their pocket to do something different."

The National Farmers Union suggests that to build a sustainable beef industry and preserve Albertan heritage, we have to reduce our export dependence on the United States and open up European and Asian markets by eliminating hormone use. They also suggest reducing herd sizes to match Canadian demand and focus on local food. This will give less power to the large feedlot and slaughterhouse operators in Canada and put the power back into the hands of small family farms.

The cowboy image is often romanticized in movies and books, but the reality is much harsher. Throughout history, the cowboy has learned to live off the land and adapt to difficult living conditions, fostering a deep-rooted respect and connection to the land. Abstaining from eating meat and supporting the cattle industry is pretty much a slap in the face with a celery stick to the cowboy culture and ethos. When looking in from the other side of the fence, however, it is hard to ignore the environmental deterioration and ethical issues in raising beef when cattle are kept in pens tighter than peas in a pod.




Click on title for article w/ working links;
http://thegauntlet.ca/story/14410

CONTAGIOUS EQUINE METRITIS - UK: (ENGLAND), OIE

***********************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: 25 Mar 2010
Source: OIE WAHID (World Animal Health Information Database) Disease
Information 2010; 23() [edited]



Contagious equine metritis,United Kingdom
-----------------------------------------
Information received on 23 Mar 2010 from Dr Nigel Gibbens, Chief
Veterinary Officer, Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London,
United Kingdom

Summary
Report type: Immediate notification
Start date 18 Mar 2010
Date of 1st confirmation of the event 22 Mar 2010
Report date 23 Mar 2010
Date submitted to OIE 23 Mar 2010
Reason for notification: Reoccurrence of a listed disease
Date of previous occurrence 22 Dec 2009
Manifestation of disease: Sub-clinical infection
Causal agent: Taylorella equigenitalis
Nature of diagnosis: Laboratory (advanced)
This event pertains to a defined zone within the country

New outbreaks
Outbreak 1 Beamish, County Durham, England
Date of start of the outbreak 18 Mar 2010
Outbreak status: Continuing (or date resolved not provided)
Epidemiological unit: Farm
Species Equidae
Susceptible
Cases 1
Deaths 0
Destroyed 0
Slaughtered 0
Affected Population: One animal affected (a 10-year-old Highland
mare). Further information to follow pending a visit to the premises
by a veterinary officer on 23 March 2010.

Epidemiology - Source of the outbreak(s) or origin of infection.
Unknown or inconclusive. Epidemiological comments: A full
investigation will be undertaken by a veterinary officer on 23 March 2010.

Laboratory name and type: Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Bury St
Edmunds (OIE's Reference Laboratory)
Species Equidae
Test pathogen isolation on cell culture
Test date 22 Mar 2010
Result Positive

Species Equidae
Test Equidae polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Test date 22 Mar 2010
Result Positive

Future Reporting
The event is continuing. Weekly follow-up reports will be submitted.

----
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail


[The 1st case of contagious equine metritis (CEM) was diagnosed in
1977 near Newmarket in the UK. Since then it spread first to the
United States and then to several parts of Europe and other
countries. A good summary of the clinical disease, epidemiology and
its diagnosis can be found in Contagious equine metritis - USA (04):
(TX) 20090116.0178 or at Iowa State's Center for Food Safety and
Public Health at


A previous OIE report on 5 Mar 2010 indicated that a horse with no
clinical signs, residing in Devon in the Southwest of England, was
identified as positive for CEM. The report indicates that "the
stallion was being routinely tested for Taylorella equigenitalis
(CEMO) prior to the mating season, and found to be positive. Previous
test on 21 Jan 2010 was negative. Horse originated from another
Member State of the European Union."

Additionally, the horse identified as positive in the United Arab
Emirates in November of 2009 was exported from the United Kingdom.
Finally, according to the OIE WAHID database, there was a 7-year-old
non-thoroughbred mare residing in Buckinghamshire, also tested
positive for CEM last October. - Mod.PC]

[See also:
2009
----
Contagious equine metritis - UK (England), OIE 20091024.3672
Contagious equine metritis - United Arab Emirates: (DU) OIE 20091118.3976
Contagious equine metritis - USA: (13) (multistate) 20090816.2906
Contagious equine metritis - USA (12): (multistate) 20090531.2018
Contagious equine metritis - USA (11): (multistate) 20090510.1742
Contagious equine metritis - USA (10): update 20090327.1191
Contagious equine metritis - USA (09): (KY) 20090319.1104
Contagious equine metritis - USA (08): (GA) 20090319.1100
Contagious equine metritis - USA (07): (WI) 20090309.0976
Contagious equine metritis - Canada 20090222.0735
Contagious equine metritis - USA (06): update 20090205.0512
Contagious equine metritis - USA (05): (ME) 20090131.0442
Contagious equine metritis - USA (04): (TX) 20090116.0178
Contagious equine metritis - USA (03): (WI) 20090109.0084
Contagious equine metritis - USA (02): (OK) 20090106.0054
Contagious equine metritis - USA: (KY), OIE 20090102.0012
2005
----
Contagious equine metritis - UK: OIE 20050408.1018 ]
.....................pc/ejp/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
###################################

Thursday, March 25, 2010

BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE - USA (02): (MICHIGAN)

A ProMED-mail postProMED-mail is a program of theInternational Society for Infectious Diseases Date: 23 Mar 2010Source: Up North Live.com [edited] An Emmet County cow is found positive for bovine tuberculosis (TB), now all cattle herds within a 10-mile radius of the farm will have to be tested within 6 months. Routine bovine tuberculosis (TB) surveillance testing, conducted by the Michigan Department of Agriculture (MDA), found a bovine TB positive herd in Emmet County in Northern Lower Michigan's Modified Accredited Advanced Zone (MAAZ). "If we test all the cattle herds within a 10-mile radius circle around the positive herd, and they are negative, the status of the MAAZ will not be impacted, as there would have to be at least 3 positive cattle herds in the zone in a year, for the status to drop," said Dr. James Averill, MDA's bovine TB project coordinator. "There are 67 farms that will be contacted and informed of the need to test for bovine TB." An informational meeting for Emmet County producers is scheduled for Wed 21 Apr 2010, from 7-9 p.m. at the West Traverse Township Hall, 8001 M-119, Harbor Springs, Michigan. On 4 Jan 2010, the MDA, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), expanded the MAAZ to include Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, and Otsego counties. Michigan rules divided the MAAZ into subzones, which are areas with decreasing prevalence of bovine TB in both cattle and wildlife. Emmet County is in Subzone 1 of the MAAZ. In this Subzone, cattle producers test their herd every 1, 2, or 3 years, depending upon the type of cattle they sell. "All cattle and bison farms within the 10-mile circle of the positive herd will be tested within the next 6 months and then revert back to their normal testing schedule if they all come up negative," said Averill. "This testing will protect all Michigan cattlemen from the small chance of buying TB infected cattle. The ultimate goal is to return bovine TB Free status to the entire state -- and we want to do everything we can to ensure we reach that goal." Although testing is an effective way to prevent bovine TB from spreading to other herds, there is a continued presence of TB in the wild white tailed deer population in Northern Lower Michigan. To reduce the risk of a herd getting infected from surrounding deer, producers can put practices in place and become verified in the Wildlife Risk Mitigation program. Cattle farmers in Subzone 1 who obtain this status are at lower risk, and can move cattle more freely than those who do not. While infection can occur by nose-to-nose direct contact, infection is much more likely to occur when cattle feed is contaminated by infected deer [saliva, nasal droplets, etc]. Beef and dairy farmers can decrease the risk of exposing their cattle to bovine TB by limiting cattle-to-deer contact and protecting cattle feed from deer with wildlife risk mitigation tools. MDA's Director Don Koivisto signed an updated Zoning Order on 23 Mar 2010, clarifying the testing requirements for Michigan cattle from farms in the MAAZ Subzone 1 or the MAAZ that move without wildlife risk mitigation plans. For complete details, go to the Emerging Diseases website by clicking on The Emmet County herd is the 2nd TB positive herd identified in Michigan in 2010. A beef herd in Alcona County, which is in the MAAZ, was found to be infected with bovine TB in early March [2010]. Since the bovine TB eradication effort began, all of Michigan's one million cattle have been tested for the disease. Since 1998, the MDA and the USDA have detected 48 cattle herds and 5 privately owned cervid operations in Michigan's MAAZ with bovine TB positive animals on the premises -- either the premises have been depopulated or the herd was quarantined and placed under a test-and-remove program. To date, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) has tested more than 184 120 wild white-tailed deer, with 668 testing positive for bovine TB. Strategies adopted by the DNRE to reduce bovine TB in the wild white-tailed deer have reduced the prevalence rate of the disease from the high in 1995 of 4.9 percent to 1.9 percent in 2009. The disease prevalence in wild white-tailed deer has flattened in the last few years, and the risk of bovine TB positive deer infecting cattle persists. --Communicated by:ProMED-mail [Bovine tuberculosis is caused by _Mycobacteirum bovis_. While there are other _Mycobactirium_ spp, _M. bovis_ and _M. tuberculosis_ are among the most important, as these tend to move between animals and people. Disease caused by mycobacteria often develop very slowly and may take months to years to develop. These bacteria grow very slowly and only replicate every 12-20 hours. While the pathogenic species (those which can cause disease) such as _M. tuberculosis_ and _M. bovis_ can infect a human or an animal, often the individual does not know that he has been infected. In humans, those infected but without active disease can be treated to prevent disease from occurring. To prevent other animals from being infected, a diseased animal must be culled from the herd. The disease primarily affects the respiratory tract but can also spread to other parts of the body. The primary route of transmission is the exchange of respiratory secretions between infected and uninfected animals. This can be achieved through nose-to-nose contact or by the inhalation of aerosol droplets that have been exhaled by an infected animal. Animals may also become infected with _M. bovis_ by ingesting the bacteria. This could occur by ingesting feeds that have been contaminated with _M. bovis_ by other infected animals. Carnivores may become infected with bovine TB by eating infected carcasses. Various factors affect the efficiency in which _M. bovis_ is spread within a cattle herd. The number of infected animals shedding the organism, as well as the number of susceptible animals present within a herd can have an impact on the transmission of the bacteria. For example, the more animals within a herd that are shedding _M. bovis_, the greater the chance of an uninfected animal coming into contact with an infected animal. The animal density of a herd also influences the efficiency of _M. bovis_ transmission. Transmission of _M. bovis_ among animals housed in confinement facilities may be greater because of close contact. Cattle infected with bovine TB may shed bacteria in their feces, urine and milk, but these are felt to be a minor source of bacterial transmission. Environmental contamination with _M. bovis_ may play a role in the spread of bovine TB. Survival of _M. bovis_ in the environment is primarily affected by exposure to sunlight. Reports on the length of survival of _M. bovis_ vary from 18-332 days at temperatures ranging from 54-75 F. Under laboratory conditions, _M. bovis_ has been isolated for up to 8 weeks from various feeds kept at 75 F and 14 weeks from various feeds kept at 32 F. However, under field conditions, it is difficult to isolate _M. bovis_ from pastures grazed by animals known to be infected with bovine TB. Portions of this comment have been extracted from:- Mod.TG] [The interactive HealthMap/ProMED map for Michigan is available at: - CopyEd.EJP] [see also:Bovine tuberculosis, bovine - USA: (SD) 20100107.00652005----Tuberculosis, bovine, human ex cervid - USA (MI) 20050112.01022003----Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (MI) (02) 20030606.1392Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (MI) 20030217.04152002----Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (MI) 20021208.60162001----Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) 20001001.16952000----Tuberculosis, bovine, deer - USA (Michigan) 20000426.06301999----Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) (02) 19990522.0840Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) (02) 19990519.0822Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) 19990517.0803Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) 19990110.0033Tuberculosis, bovine - USA (Michigan) 19980923.1899].....................................sb/tg/ejp/dk *##########################################################*************************************************************ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports thatare posted, but the accuracy and completeness of theinformation, and of any statements or opinions basedthereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks inusing information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISIDand its associated service providers shall not be heldresponsible for errors or omissions or held liable for anydamages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon postedor archived material.************************************************************Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:************************************************************Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give yourfull name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Sendcommands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from ahuman being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.########################################################################################################################

Whats Not On The Labels

The Food Industry's Dirty Little Secrets
Share Article | Mar 24, 2010 Jill Anderson

There are things that consumers should but often do not know about their foods before they wind up on the table.


Many of today's consumers want to know where their foods come from, especially meat. They want to know how it was raised, what it was fed or subjected to and what other chemicals or pharmaceuticals it may have been treated with or exposed to. In other words, they want to know what has happened to it before eating it.

These are valid and reasonable concerns. Why is labeling required on some foods and not on others? Why are manufacturers who want to make certain facts or practices public knowledge not allowed to do so? Many of the answers to these questions are addressed in Dr. Marion Nestle's book, Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety.

According to a Consumer Reports National Research Center survey conducted in 2008, three fourths of responding consumers believe that companies who want to disclose practices and information should be allowed to do so and companies who withhold information should be compelled to disclose.

Meat Industry Facts That Should Be Made Public

Just before biting into that big slab of steak, stop and think about whether or not it was tested for bovine spongiform encephalopathy more commonly known as Mad Cow Disease. The answer is probably no since only 1 percent of the 400 cattle an hour slaughtered in the USA are tested for BSE. Some meat packing houses would voluntarily perform testing but the USDA will not allow it.

Ads by Google
Custom Packaging
Our boxes and materials or yours Save cost with Mid-Hudson Workshop.
www.midhudsonworkshop.orgPersonalized Kids Labels
Durable labels for kids Shipped in 24 hrs, Truly Unbeatable
www.LovableLabels.ca


Wouldn't it be nice to know if the meat in the supermarket has been treated with carbon monoxide? Consumers should not rely on color as a means of determining carbon monoxide contamination however, treated meats can retain a bright, fresh look long past the normal spoilage time. Labels are not required to disclose that contents have been treated.

The most disturbing hidden fact of all is the sale of meat and by products from cloned or genetically modified animals. Five digit codes beginning with the number eight on produce stickers signify genetically altered plant foods but there is no such labeling slated for the genetically altered meats that are soon to reach American supermarkets. There will be no disclosure of cloned meats which may already be in the stores.

Genetic engineering is the insertion of DNA from one species into the DNA of another. There are plenty of disgusting examples of plant manipulation such as tomatoes with DNA from Flounder, potatoes with jellyfish DNA and worst of all rice with human DNA. Genetically engineered animals for consumption is the new target in the never ending quest to improve upon nature!

The Scoop on Growth Hormones
Wet cows or dairy cattle are routinely given the hormone RBST or Recumbinant Bovine Somatotropine to stimulate milk production. Some dairies, though not organic are voluntarily labeling their milk products as having no RBST and yet some states are trying to pass laws that forbid disclosure of this information. The reason given is that percieved value (to consumers) of the hormone free product gives those comapanies an unfair advantage over those who choose not to disclose.

Cows treated with RBST routinely suffer from more utter infections thus requiring more and stronger doses of antibiotics. These are linked to increased tumor growth in the animal and more output of an insulin type hormone that stimulates growth. Studies are continually looking at how this affects humans in regard to increased cancer rates, especially in children.

How COOL Is That


COOL in this case refers to Country of Origin Labeling which until recently was only required on plant products but has been expanded to include retail meat, fish and fowl. While this is certainly a step in the right direction it does not include packaged processed foods or even pre-bagged salads or dried fruit.

Enabling US markets to purchase from approved sources helps in avoiding foods from known areas of contamination or other issues. There are problems though. There is still much controversy over farming and growing practices in other countries with which the US trades.

It simply is not possible to shop mindlessly anymore. There are so many hidden dangers waiting for the uninformed consumer. Best shopping practices should include buying local, sustainable whole foods as much as possible, shopping for organic meats and dairy, avoiding processed foods and purchasing from reputable supermarkets who attempt to provide clean, quality products.

Resources
Safe Foods: The Politics of Food Safety by Dr. Marion Nestle

Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser

sustainabletable.org

Cornell University's Sprecher Institute for Comparative Cancer Research


Share

Read more at Suite101: Whats Not On The Labels: The Food Industry's Dirty Little Secrets http://cookingresources.suite101.com/article.cfm/whats-not-on-the-labels#ixzz0j9rCUVCZ




http://cookingresources.suite101.com/article.cfm/whats-not-on-the-labels

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Beef "Growers" Oppose Regulation that would make our food more safe

The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently announced it would be altering a program aimed at tracking all livestock. North Carolina farmers worry new regulations will make business more expensive.


Transcript:

After mad cow disease spread worry about unsafe meat, federal farm officials created the National Animal Identification System in 2004.

Chris Waldrop is a food policy expert at the Consumer Federation of America. He says the intent was to protect people from tainted food.

“If you have an animal that’s diseased out there, an animal that may have been identified with mad cow disease, you need to be able to trace it throughout the cattle herd as quickly as possible so that doesn’t spread.” (.09)

Only forty percent of farmers opted into the voluntary program.

Mark Teder’s family has farmed in Stokes County for thirty years. He says he loves working with his fifteen head of cattle in his fields. And he gets sad when he sees housing developments pop up on what has always been farm land.

Like many North Carolina cattlemen, Teder and his father raise calves.

“Our cattle are semi-tall, angus cross cattle. We breed them with registered Angus bulls which gets a good cross-bred calf. A good calf that will hit the ground growing, we usually wean our calves 500 pounds and then sell them on the market.” (.22)

The government wants to know where Teder’s calves go. The new iteration of animal ID will track animals that cross state lines and largely shift the work to the states.

Teder sells them to two buyers in the state and one in Virginia. In turn, they sell them to feed lots out west to fatten up.

He says he sees the value in tracking animals but the whole concept stirs a lot of fear in people.

“People who fool with cattle in Stokes County are older people, and they don’t like change. They got a few cows out here and they like to see them grazing. But they don’t want to have to fool with anything that the government says they have to do, or that anybody says they have to do.” (.20)

Skeptics of national animal ID exist in Washington, too. Republican U.S. Senator Richard Burr says ranchers are weary of any new regulation.

“I think the question is, what are you getting at? What’s the purpose of doing it? I think we’ve got the safest food system in the world. I don’t think there’s any question.” (.12)

Burr says the U.S. had stringent ag-policies when mad cow disease hit … and something bad will always manage to slip through the system.

Voluntary - that’s the word Colin Woodall needs to hear in the discussion. He’s a lobbyist with the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, and opposes any plan that forces a farmer to do anything.

He supports shifting the effort to the states – even if that means there could be fifty unique programs.

“If there are 50 different systems, that’s not a problem if they can all talk to each other.” (.05)

That may not worry Woodall, but it certainly concerns David Marshall. He’s the state veterinarian.

“Some states may opt for brands, particularly the Midwestern states for their cattle ID. Other states may opt for traditional metal ear tags, others for bangle visual ear tags.” (.15)

The Agriculture Department says it will take two years to develop and implement new systems. Marshall and other state vets are talking with USDA about how to proceed.

Back in Stokes County, Mark Teder says he’ll comply with whatever comes … because he’ll have to. After all, he knows a good product means good business. But he worries that any extra costs could mean the end of the small-scale rancher.

“A lot of the producers don’t have the facility to work a cow, to vaccinate a cow, just to catch a cow. But I think when they go to making this mandatory a lot of them is going to say, ‘Hey, I’m not going to do it. I’m going to get out, sell my herd and get out.” (.20)

But with more and more people concerned about where their food comes from, consumers may want it to be mandatory. After all, you are what you eat.





http://www.capitolnewsconnection.org/node/14363

Pork Up Beef Down, Bloomberg Report Says

Guess the Hog-Interest spin alleging no connection to swine flu was bought by the people "hook line and stinker, I mean "sinker."

Hog Futures Fall as U.S. Herd Cuts May Be Slowing; Cattle Drop
March 23, 2010, 1:00 PM EDT

By Whitney McFerron
March 23 (Bloomberg) -- Hog futures fell from a 12-year high on speculation that a government report this week will show U.S. producers are slowing cuts in the sow herd after making their first profits in two years. Cattle tumbled.

On March 26, the U.S. Department of Agriculture may report a slower pace of breeding-herd reductions, said Don Roose, the president of U.S. Commodities Inc. in West Des Moines, Iowa. Supply cuts sparked a 25 percent jump in wholesale-pork prices in the past year. The meat sold for 73.47 cents a pound yesterday, down 0.5 percent from March 19, USDA data show.

“All eyes are focused on that report Friday afternoon,” Roose said. “The key thing people are looking for is: Have we stopped liquidation cold in its tracks and maybe even started some expansion? We’re back to profits after quarters of losses.”

Hog futures for June settlement dropped 1.025 cents, or 1.2 percent, to 81.825 cents a pound at 11:57 a.m. on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Yesterday, the price reached 83.5 cents, the highest level for a most-active contract since May 1997. Before today, the commodity was up 12 percent in the past year.

Pork-belly futures for May delivery rose 2.6 cents, or 2.8 percent, to 95.75 cents a pound. Earlier, the price jumped by the exchange limit of 3 cents. Yesterday, the USDA reported a 27 percent drop in supplies during the past year at U.S. warehouses with 55.6 million pounds at the end of February. Pork bellies are cured and sliced to make bacon.

Cattle Slide

Cattle futures for June delivery slid 1.625 cents, or 1.7 percent, to 92.45 cents a pound. A close at that price would be the biggest drop for a most-active contract since March 6, 2009. Feeder-cattle futures for May settlement declined 0.8 cent, or 0.7 percent, to $1.085 a pound.

Speculators may have sold contracts after cattle prices reached a 17-month high last week, said Troy Vetterkind, the owner of Vetterkind Cattle Brokerage in Chicago. In the week ended March 16, net-long positions, or bets on a rally, by hedge funds and other large speculators rose 1.8 percent to 93,700 cattle contracts, extending an advance to a record, government data show.

“We’re seeing some fund selling with ideas that we might have topped out the cash market,” Vetterkind said. Spot-market cattle in Texas, the biggest producing state, sold for about 97 cents a pound yesterday, little changed to 1 cent lower than last week, he said.

--Editors: Patrick McKiernan, Steve Stroth

To contact the reporter on this story: Whitney McFerron in Chicago at wmcferron1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steve Stroth at sstroth@bloomberg.net.









http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-23/hog-futures-fall-as-u-s-herd-cuts-may-be-slowing-cattle-drop.html

CWD Moves in to ND

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE, CERVID - USA (08): (NORTH DAKOTA) FIRST REPORT
***********************************************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Mon 22 Mar 2010
Source: Daily News [edited]



Chronic wasting disease is here. We knew it was just a matter of
time. North Dakota has long been an island, free of chronic wasting
disease (CWD) in the deer herd. Surrounding states and provinces have
dealt with the problem to one degree or another. States like Colorado
and Wyoming have had widespread problems with CWD since the disease
was first identified in the 1960s.

North Dakota is no longer CWD free. Last fall [2009] a deer hunter in
unit 3F2 (west side of Missouri River, bordering South Dakota) killed
a mule deer buck that appeared to be sick. He reported it and test
samples were taken of the deer and tested along with the state's
regular testing protocol that included 3000 samples taken this year
[2010].

Last week [week of 15 Mar 2010], after testing only 2/3 of those
samples, the test result from that sick mule deer came up positive
for CWD. The rest of the samples will be tested over the next month.

[Byline: Curt Wells]

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail



[According to a report from The Bismarck Tribune dated 17 Mar 2010
(),
on 18 Nov 2009 a 2.5-year-old mule deer buck was shot in unit 3F2,
extreme western Sioux County
(), about 5
miles (8 km) north of the South Dakota border.

The Midwestern state of North Dakota can be located on the
HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of the US at
. - Sr.Tech.Ed.MJ]

[see also:
Chronic wasting disease, cervid - USA (03): (MO) 1st rep. 20100303.0697
2009
----
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (10): (WY) 20091112.3925
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (09): (WY) 20091106.3841
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (08): (MN) depopulation 20091031.3770
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (07): (WY) 20091015.3548
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (06): (MN) culling 20090923.3344
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (05): disease spread 20090911.3198
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA: (MN) 20090131.0443
2008
----
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA: (02)(SD), 2007 20080218.0653
2006
----
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) 20060616.1669
2003
----
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) (03) 20030725.1822
Chronic wasting disease, cervids, 2002 - USA (SD) (02) 20030313.0622
Chronic wasting disease, cervids, 2002 - USA (SD) 20030203.0293
2002
----
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) (04) 20021120.5855
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) (03) 20020827.5162
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) (02) 20020820.5099
Chronic wasting disease, cervids - USA (SD) 20020304.3679]
...................................sb/mhj/mj/lm

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
################################################

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Getting 2 Know Your Mad-Cow Prion




Scientists Discover Lifeless Prion “Proteins” Capable of Evolution
AMOG Home / Tech

M Dee Dubroff

Friday, March 19, 2010

If you are like many of us (this author included), you may not know what a prion is or why it is important. A prion is an infectious agent that is composed primarily of protein. It infects and re-propagates by refolding abnormally into a structure, which converts normal molecules into an abnormal form.

If this seems a little out of the horror flick, Alien, to you, you are not that far from wrong. Prions, without even trying, are just as malicious, and have been known to cause at least twenty diseases that are fatal to humans and animals.



For the first time in history, scientists at the American Scripps Research Institute have demonstrated that “lifeless” prion proteins, devoid of all genetic material, can evolve just like higher forms of life. They can adapt to suit their environment and develop a resistance to drugs.

According to Charles Weissmann, head of Scripps Florida’s department of Infectology who led the study: “On the face of it, you have exactly the same process of mutation and adaptive change in prions as you see in viruses.”

The study was published in the journal, Science, and those scientists involved were very excited that their revelations might suggest new methods in developing therapies for diseases. The study involved transferring prion populations from brain cells to other cells and observing the new environment. When the prions were returned to the brain cells, the brain-adapted prions took over the population.



In the words of Professor John Collinge of the Medical Research Council Prion Unit:

“This … pattern of Darwinian evolution appears to be universally active. In viruses, mutation is linked to changes in nucleic acid sequence that leads to resistance. Now, this adaptability has moved one level down – to prions and protein folding, and it’s clear that you do not need nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) for the process of evolution. This is a timely reminder that prion concerns are not going away and that controls to stop abnormal prions being transmitted to humans through the food system or through blood transfusions must be vigorously maintained.”

One terrible example of prions at work during infections is the human form of mad cow disease known as vCJD. In this case, abnormal proteins convert the normal host prion protein into its deadly form by altering its shape.

Collinge referred to what he calls “the cloud hypothesis” which concerns the multitude of prion proteins found in the human body that he suggested some two years ago. He goes on to say:

“Now we know that the abnormal prions replicate, and create variants, perhaps at a low level initially. But once they are transferred to a new host, natural selection will eventually choose the more virulent and aggressive variants. The prion protein is not a clone, it is a quasi-species that can create different protein strains even in the same animal.”

Current work on prions clearly suggests that it would be better to nip the supply of prion proteins in the bud rather than wait and risk abnormal adaptations that could take over in a more virulent form.

This would be really scary fodder for a sci-fi/ horror flick, but unfortunately, it isn’t fiction.






http://amog.com/tech/prions-capable-evolution/


Scientists Discover Lifeless Prion “Proteins” Capable of Evolution
M Dee Dubroff

Friday, March 19, 2010

If you are like many of us (this author included), you may not know what a prion is or why it is important. A prion is an infectious agent that is composed primarily of protein. It infects and re-propagates by refolding abnormally into a structure, which converts normal molecules into an abnormal form.

If this seems a little out of the horror flick, Alien, to you, you are not that far from wrong. Prions, without even trying, are just as malicious, and have been known to cause at least twenty diseases that are fatal to humans and animals.



For the first time in history, scientists at the American Scripps Research Institute have demonstrated that “lifeless” prion proteins, devoid of all genetic material, can evolve just like higher forms of life. They can adapt to suit their environment and develop a resistance to drugs.

According to Charles Weissmann, head of Scripps Florida’s department of Infectology who led the study: “On the face of it, you have exactly the same process of mutation and adaptive change in prions as you see in viruses.”

The study was published in the journal, Science, and those scientists involved were very excited that their revelations might suggest new methods in developing therapies for diseases. The study involved transferring prion populations from brain cells to other cells and observing the new environment. When the prions were returned to the brain cells, the brain-adapted prions took over the population.



In the words of Professor John Collinge of the Medical Research Council Prion Unit:

“This … pattern of Darwinian evolution appears to be universally active. In viruses, mutation is linked to changes in nucleic acid sequence that leads to resistance. Now, this adaptability has moved one level down – to prions and protein folding, and it’s clear that you do not need nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) for the process of evolution. This is a timely reminder that prion concerns are not going away and that controls to stop abnormal prions being transmitted to humans through the food system or through blood transfusions must be vigorously maintained.”

One terrible example of prions at work during infections is the human form of mad cow disease known as vCJD. In this case, abnormal proteins convert the normal host prion protein into its deadly form by altering its shape.

Collinge referred to what he calls “the cloud hypothesis” which concerns the multitude of prion proteins found in the human body that he suggested some two years ago. He goes on to say:

“Now we know that the abnormal prions replicate, and create variants, perhaps at a low level initially. But once they are transferred to a new host, natural selection will eventually choose the more virulent and aggressive variants. The prion protein is not a clone, it is a quasi-species that can create different protein strains even in the same animal.”



Current work on prions clearly suggests that it would be better to nip the supply of prion proteins in the bud rather than wait and risk abnormal adaptations that could take over in a more virulent form.

This would be really scary fodder for a sci-fi/ horror flick, but unfortunately, it isn’t fiction.






http://amog.com/tech/prions-capable-evolution/

Friday, March 19, 2010

BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS - UK: (ENGLAND) SHEEP

*****************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Thu 18 Mar 2010
Source: Farmers Guardian [edited]



Bovine TB found in sheep and wild boar
--------------------------------------
Concerns that bTB [bovine tuberculosis] is becoming increasingly
prevalent in species other than cattle and badgers have been
heightened by the discovery of the disease in sheep and wild boar.

It has emerged that a flock of Lleyn sheep in Gloucestershire has
been placed under TB restriction.

Vets were alerted by chronic weight loss in 20 of 220 ewes and one
ram. Postmortem findings in 3 of the 6 sheep were consistent with TB
and _Mycobacterium bovis_ spoligotype 10, the predominant strain in
local cattle herds and wildlife, was subsequently isolated. Lesions
in these 3 sheep were 'extensive', a letter in the Veterinary Record reports.

A Defra spokesman said the movement restrictions would only be lifted
when Animal Health was confident that the flock is free from TB. He
said _M. bovis_ in sheep was 'considered rare'.

The Department has also revealed that 'lesions consistent with TB'
have been identified in a feral wild boar in the Ross-on-Wye area
during post-mortem examination by the Veterinary Laboratory Agency (VLA).

Defra figures show there were over 140 bTB cases identified in
individual animals other than cattle in 2009, including in 68
alpacas, 26 cats, 23 pigs, and 5 sheep. The true numbers are almost
certainly much higher as there is no active surveillance in non-bovine species.

Defra said most other species 'generally act only as spillover hosts'
from cattle and badgers with disease not sustained within populations
without an external source of infection.

National Sheep Association chief executive Peter Morris said cases in
sheep were 'not unexpected' and that the industry was not required to
take additional actions.

[Byline: Alistair Driver]

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail Rapporteur Mary Marshall

[In view of the rarity of clinical bTB in sheep and differential
diagnostic considerations, it has been found worthwhile to reproduce
the full text of the letter published in the Veterinary Record of 6
Mar 2010 (166:306):

_Mycobacterium bovis_ causing clinical disease in adult sheep
-----------------------------------------------------------
I would like to report an outbreak of clinical tuberculosis (TB) in a
flock of Lleyn sheep in Gloucestershire.

Chronic weight loss in 20 of 220 ewes and one ram was investigated by
the flock's private veterinary surgeon. Field postmortem examinations
of 2 ewes revealed enlarged, abscessed, mediastinal lymph nodes, but
routine cultures remained sterile. Serological follow-up did not
reveal any evidence of caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) [a rather common
ovine infection caused by _Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis_. -
Mod.AS] The absence of a diagnosis prompted the submission of 6 sheep
that had shown chronic weight loss to the Veterinary Laboratories
Agency (VLA) for postmortem examination.

Gross postmortem findings in 3 of the 6 sheep were consistent with TB
and _Mycobacterium bovis_ spoligotype 10 (the predominant strain of
the bacterium in local cattle herds and wildlife) was subsequently
isolated. Lesions in these 3 sheep were extensive and affected the
lungs, lymph nodes, and viscera.

Clinical signs and postmortem findings of TB in sheep may resemble
lesions of visceral CLA. Failure to demonstrate serological or
bacteriological evidence in cases of suspect CLA should trigger a
suspicion of possible TB. Colleagues are reminded that suspect cases
of TB detected in farm animals are notifiable to Animal Health. The
small number of previous incidents of _M. bovis_ infection in sheep
in Great Britain have been incidental findings at slaughter or at
postmortem examination, but have not been associated with clinical
signs. The VLA plans to provide more details of this incident in the
near future.

Guda van der Burgt
VLA - Luddington
Luddington, Stratford upon Avon
Warwickshire CV37 9SJ
UK


bTB can obviously infect also dairy sheep. It will be interesting to
note the response of public health authorities and the Food Standards
Agency in Britain to the described development and the continued
spread of _M. bovis_ within the UK animal domain. - Mod.AS]

[The HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of the UK is available at
. - Sr.Tech.Ed.MJ]

[see also:
2009
----
Bovine tuberculosis, human - UK: (England) 20090808.2815
Bovine tuberculosis - UK (05): (England) alpaca 20090730.2667
Bovine tuberculosis - UK (04): badger vaccination 20090707.2443
Bovine tuberculosis - UK (03): increased incidence 20090514.1809
Bovine tuberculosis - UK (02): (Wales) 20090323.1143
Tuberculosis, bovine - UK: (Wales) 20090107.0066
2008
----
Bovine tuberculosis, feline - UK (02) 20081126.3722
Bovine tuberculosis - UK: increased incidence 20081123.3696
Bovine tuberculosis, domestic animals - UK (02) 20081112.3565
Bovine tuberculosis, domestic animals - UK 20081111.3551
Bovine tuberculosis, feline - UK 20081005.3141
Bovine tuberculosis, human, canine - UK: (England) (02) 20080927.3054
Bovine tuberculosis, human, canine - UK: (England) 20080903.2751
Bovine tuberculosis, caprine - UK: (Wales) 20080723.2229
2006
----
Bovine tuberculosis, human - UK (England) (02) 20061015.2967
Bovine tuberculosis, human - UK (England) 20061009.2896
Tuberculosis, bovine, badgers - UK 20061005.2857
Tuberculosis, bovine - UK: badger vaccine trial 20060622.1724
2005
----
Tuberculosis, bovine - UK (England) 20051209.3549
Tuberculosis, bovine, pigs - UK (England) 20050713.1996]
...................................arn/mj/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
####################################################

BLUETONGUE - EUROPE: BTV-8 TIME AND PLACE OF INTRODUCTION

*********************************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Fri 19 Mar 2010 [accessed]
Source: PLoS (Public Library of Science) ONE Volume 5, Issue 2,
e9405, pp 1-9 [edited]



[Reference: Saegerman C, Mellor P, Uyttenhoef A, Hanon J-B,
Kirschvink N, et al: The Most Likely Time and Place of Introduction
of BTV8 into Belgian Ruminants. PLoS ONE 5(2): e9405.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009405]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
--------
Background
----------
In northern Europe, bluetongue (BT) caused by the BT virus (BTV),
serotype 8, was first notified in August 2006 and numerous ruminant
herds were affected in 2007 and 2008. However, the origin and the
time and place of the original introduction have not yet been determined.

Methods and principal findings
------------------------------
4 retrospective epidemiological surveys have been performed to enable
determination of the initial spatiotemporal occurrence of this
emerging disease in southern Belgium: investigations of the 1st
recorded outbreaks near to the disease epicenter; a large anonymous,
random postal survey of cattle herds and sheep flocks; a random
historical milk tank survey of samples tested with an indirect ELISA
and a follow-up survey of nonspecific health indicators. The original
introduction of BTV into the region probably occurred during spring
2006 near to the National Park of Hautes Fagnes and Eifel when
_Culicoides_ become active.

Conclusions/significance
------------------------
The determination of the most likely time and place of introduction
of BTV8 into a country is of paramount importance to enhance
awareness and understanding and, to improve modeling of vector-borne
emerging infectious diseases.

--
Communicated by:
Sabine Zentis
Castleview Pedigree English Longhorns
Gut Laach
52385 Nideggen
Germany


[Determining the actual timing of the BTV-8 introduction into
northern Europe is a welcome contribution to the accumulating
knowledge regarding the "when" and, to some extent, the "where"
question; the origin and particularly the "how" and "who" questions
remain unsolved. In fact, they are the key issues with potential
implications for future possible events, which may involve also
additional orbiviruses or other vector-borne disease agents of animal and man.

Which animals or other means for virus/vector introduction reached
the suspected region in spring 2006? Were these viraemic animals or
carriers of infected vectors? Several speculations have been brought
forward, awaiting their analysis, which may involve investigations
into various routes, species, goods, international public (including
equestrian) events... For the time being, this enigmatic panzootic in
large and small ruminants, which has spread within vast parts of
Western Europe and elsewhere since 2006, remains an unfinished story.

The location of National Park of Hautes Fagnes and Eifel, shared by
Belgium and Germany, is indicated in a map, which is included in the
paper, freely accessible at URL above.- Mod.AS]

[see also:
2006
----
Bluetongue - Europe (08): BTV-8 origin 20061004.2838
Bluetongue - Europe (07): BTV-8 origin 20061002.2826
Bluetongue - Europe (06): BTV-8 origin 20060923.2713
Bluetongue - Netherlands, Belgium, Germany (08): BTV-8 origin 20060915.2615]
...................................arn/mj/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
#################################################

ANTHRAX, HUMAN, BOVINE - PHILIPPINES (04): (CAGAYAN)

****************************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: 19 Mar 2010
Source: Manila Bulletin Publishing Corporation
http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/248542/anthrax-vaccination-animals>


Anthrax vaccination for animals
-------------------------------
A massive vaccination of animals against anthrax disease is underway
in Cagayan province, following a report last month that residents
fell ill from eating a carabao stricken with the deadly disease.

Dr. Arnulfo Perez, Chief of the Animal Division of the Cagayan
Veterinary Office, told the Manila Bulletin Friday [19 Mar 2010] that
his office has been conducting vaccination of cattle, carabao, and
goats against anthrax disease. "We had already vaccinated with
anti-anthrax [vaccine] the animals from Lasam and Enrile towns,"
Perez said, referring to the towns where animals had earlier tested
positive for anthrax disease.

[Byline: Freddie G. Lazaro]

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail


[There are clearly benefits when President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
orders the Department of Health (DOH) to assist local government
units (LGUs); see the last posting 20100304.0714. - Mod.MHJ]

[The interactive HealthMap/ProMED map for the Philippines is available at:
- CopyEd.EJP]

[see also:
Anthrax, human, bovine - Philippines (03): (CG) 20100304.0714
Anthrax, human, bovine - Philippines (02): (CG) 20100302.0688
Anthrax, human, bovine - Philippines: (CG) 20100301.0676
2009
----
Anthrax, human, livestock - Philippines: (Luzon) 20091205.4149]
......................sb/mhj/ejp/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
#################################################

U.S. to Beg Japan for Fairer Share of Markets

U.S. seeks greater market access to Japan for beef, insurance
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:50 PM

WASHINGTON, Mar. 17, 2010 (Kyodo News International) -- Beef and automobiles are among the markets Japan should make more accessible to U.S. firms, a senior U.S. official said Wednesday.

Testifying at a subcommittee of the House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs, Joseph Donovan, principal deputy assistant secretary of state, also called on Japan to give U.S. competitors an equal footing with Japanese counterparts in the insurance and finance sectors, citing Japan Post as a market player with an unfair advantage

In a prepared testimony to the House panel, Donovan said Tokyo should adopt a standard for beef imports based on science and international norms.

He also urged Japan to foster a business environment that welcomes foreign investment, through policy or statements.

Japan and the United States are at loggerheads over Washington's insistence that Tokyo abolish all of its limits on U.S. beef imports for meat coming from cattle aged 20 or younger.

Japan suspended all beef imports from the United States after the first U.S. case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as mad cow disease, was found in 2003.

It later partially reopened the market with certain restrictions, including the 20-month age limit.

The United States has argued that American beef has been scientifically proven safe for consumption.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack is expected to ask Japan to fully reopen its beef market when he visits the country in early April.



ttp://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3957

Victims of Contaminated Meat Call on USDA to Address Deadly Pathogens

"Could Your Lunch Kill You?" Protest Shines Spotlight on Need for New Meat Regulations

WASHINGTON, March 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- S.T.O.P. - Safe Tables Our Priority and victims of foodborne illness called upon the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to recognize as adulterants six other potentially deadly types of E. coli bacteria in addition to the notorious E. coli O157:H7 that is currently classified as an adulterant. All seven strains are known to cause devastating human illness and are transmitted through feces-contaminated beef products.

"The USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have known for decades of the public health risks posed by non-O157 strains of E. coli," said S.T.O.P. President Nancy Donley, whose son died from E. coli O157 in 1993. "Yet, 10 years after requiring public health laboratories to report positive test results for these strains from infected people, nothing has been done to prevent meat contaminated with these strains from entering into commerce."

E. coli O157:H7 was declared an adulterant in ground beef in 1994 in the aftermath of an outbreak that sickened more than 700 people and killed at least four. The CDC has since identified six additional strains of shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) -- O26, O111, O103, O121, O45 and O145 -- associated with severe illness and death. Just like E. coli O157:H7, these STEC strains get into the nation's beef supply when cattle feces contaminate meat during slaughter and processing.

At a demonstration outside USDA, Donley and other victim members of S.T.O.P. demanded that USDA enact health-based strategies to prevent all types of E. coli-contaminated beef from reaching consumers' tables. This includes:

Recognizing as adulterants the six additional E. coli strains.
Expanding the definition of adulterant to include E .coli O157:H7 when in any type of beef, not just ground beef or beef intended for ground beef.
Implementing better ways of tracing all STEC outbreaks to prevent widespread illness and deaths.
Asking Congress for mandatory USDA recall authority. Currently, all government agency food recalls are voluntary and issued by the companies responsible.



According to the CDC, 76 million Americans become sick from foodborne pathogens each year and 325,000 are hospitalized, of which 5,000 die.

For more information and to sign up for E-alerts on food recalls and outbreaks, visit www.safetables.org.





http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/victims-of-contaminated-meat-call-on-usda-to-address-deadly-pathogens-88424522.html

BRUCELLOSIS, BOVINE - RUSSIA: (VOLGOGRAD)

*****************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Fri 12 March 2010
Source: Height 102.0 Information Agency [in Russian, trans. Corr.ATS, edited]



An outbreak of brucellosis in cattle has been registered in the
Kletskiy rayon (district) according to the local authorities. The
incident involving 51 cattle happened in the village of Ventsi. A
veterinary post has been installed in the village to prevent trade of
milk and dairy products.

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-RUS


[The most recent official information on the situation of the
zoonotic disease bovine brucellosis (typically caused by _Brucella
abortus_) in Russia, as available on the OIE website, dates back to
2005. During that year, 402 bovines, in at least 3 locations, were
found positive within the Volgograd oblast; no slaughter or culling
of these animals was reported.

The HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of Russia can be seen at
.
Kletskiy rayon is situated within the Volgograd oblast (No. 41 in the
Southern Federal District map at
).
The village of Ventsi is probably too small to appear on available maps.

A laboratory confirmation, excluding _B. melitensis_ (which is also
endemic in various parts of Russia and may infect cattle) is
anticipated. According to Russia's reports to the OIE, _B.
melitensis_ has not been reported from the Volgograd oblast at least
since 2005 (reports available from January 2005 to June 2009).
However, in 2008 there was suspicion that a consignment of sheep
infected with _B. melitensis_ introduced the agent in 2007, from
Volgograd to the Moscow region (see ProMED-mail 20080317.1043).

Further information on bovine brucellosis is available at
.
- Mod.AS]

[see also:
2009
----
Brucellosis, livestock, human - Russia (02): (VR) 20091012.3526
Brucellosis, livestock, human - Russia: (OM) 20090701.2380
Brucellosis, ovine, bovine - Russia: (CV) 20090423.1530
Zoonotic disease trends 2007-2008 - Russia (02): brucellosis 20090103.0025
2008
----
Brucellosis, ovine, human - Russia (Altai) 20080902.2749
Brucellosis, livestock, human - Azerbaijan, Russia 20080518.1658
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Moscow ex Volgograd) (02) 20080318.1047
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Moscow ex Volgograd) 20080317.1043
2007
----
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Buryatia) 20070611.1903
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Sverdlovsk region) 20070522.1639
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Kaluga) 20070517.1572
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Samara, Orenburg) 20070209.0510
2005
----
Brucellosis, human - Russia (Dagestan) 20050826.2523
Brucellosis, ovine - Russia (Perm) 20050303.0652
2004
----
Brucellosis, human, livestock - Russia (Moscow) 20040102.0008]
...................................arn/mj/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
##################################

RABIES, EQUINE, HUMAN EXPOSURE - USA (03): (MICHIGAN), REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

*****************************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Tue 16 Mar 2010
Source: The Horse [edited]



Michigan livestock and pet owners are being urged to vaccinate their
animals against rabies after a horse in Lapeer County tested positive
for the disease.

"It is essential pet and livestock owners take steps to vaccinate
against rabies and other diseases because of the possibility [of]
human exposure to the disease from interaction with infected horses,
cattle, dogs, and cats," said Michigan Department of Agriculture State
Veterinarian Steven Halstead, DVM. "By working with their
veterinarian, owners can take significant steps toward providing a
safe and healthy environment for their families and animals."

Quarantine was issued on the Lapeer County horse farm and will be
monitored by county animal control officers. Feral cats and any pet
cat on the premises showing clinical signs consistent with rabies or
with a history of biting someone within the previous 10 days will be
tested. [In order for the animal to be tested, it must be euthanized
and its brain examined. - Mod.TG] A total of 6 people, including the
owner, trainer, and veterinarian, that might have been exposed to the
rabid horse are receiving a series of preventative rabies shots. No
other humans or animals are known to have been exposed at this time.
[Post exposure prophylaxis is needed for human beings having been
exposed to a rabid animal . - Mod.TG]

This is the 3rd case of rabies in Michigan thus far in 2010 --
previous cases include a rabid skunk in St Clair County and a bat in
Kent County.

"It is important to make sure animals attending fairs or exhibitions,
field trials, or shows receive additional vaccinations to protect
against diseases they may be exposed to in group housing or stressful
situations. Owners should consult their private veterinarian to
develop an appropriate vaccination program specific for their
animals," Halstead said.

State law requires ferrets and dogs to be vaccinated against rabies by
a licensed veterinarian. It is also important to make sure that cats
kept indoors also be vaccinated as bats frequently get into homes
exposing the cats.

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail


[Especially for livestock that may be going to a fair, rabies vaccines
are important. Horses and cattle, and even porcines that are going to
a livestock show or rodeo or any other type of gathering should have
their rabies vaccination in addition to other communicable disease
vaccinations deemed necessary by the owner and veterinarian.

Cats and dogs should also be vaccinated against rabies.

If Dr Halstead knows the strain of rabies that the horse had, we would
appreciate being able to post the strain. Bat and skunk are the most
common in many areas of the US, but raccoon strain may be more common
in other areas. So it would be nice to know the strain that affected
this horse. - Mod.TG]

[The Midwestern state of Michigan can be located on the
HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of the US at
.
Lapeer County can be seen on the map at
. - Sr.Tech.Ed.MJ]

[see also:
Rabies, wildlife - USA (04): (TN) skunk, canine 20100307.0745
Rabies, wildlife - USA (03): (OR) fox 20100305.0733
Rabies, equine, human exposure - USA (02): (TX), clarification 20100304.0706
Rabies, equine, human exposure - USA: (TX)20100228.0667
Rabies, human exposure - USA (02): (AR, NJ) 20100226.0634
Rabies, human, presumed abortive, 2009 - USA: (TX)20100226.0633
Rabies, raccoon, feline - USA: (AL, GA)20100220.0580
Rabies, raccoon - USA (04): (NYC) vaccination 20100217.0555
Rabies, skunk, canine - USA: (KS)20100213.0518
Rabies, animal - USA: (OR, FL) alert 20100207.0418
Rabies, coyote - USA: (NY) alert 20100206.0404
Rabies, raccoon - USA (03): (NYC) feral cats, vaccine 20100205.0384
Rabies, raccoon - USA (02): (NYC)20100203.0367
Rabies, raccoon, canine, human exposure - USA: (DE)20100129.0321
Rabies, raccoon - USA (NY)20100122.0246
Rabies, bovine, human exposure - USA: (MD)20100119.0212
Rabies, wildlife - USA (02): (NJ) fox, human exposure, corr. 20100110.0113
Rabies, wildlife - USA (02): (NJ) fox, human exposure 20100109.010
Rabies, wildlife - USA: (AZ)20100101.0013]
...................................sb/tg/mj/dk
*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
#####################################

UNDIAGNOSED DIE-OFF, BOVINE - SRI LANKA: (AMPARA) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

***********************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Tue 16 Mar 2010
Source: Daily Mirror, Sri Lanka [edited]



Cattle farmers and government authorities are baffled about the
deaths of over 3000 milking cattle in the Ampara district in the past
few days, which have caused a great loss to the livelihood of cattle
breeders in the area.

The Thirukkovil Government Veterinary Surgeon said yesterday [15 Mar
2010] that nearly 3000 milking cattle had died in Thangavillai,
Ampara as a result of progressive emaciation due to close herding of
cattle as well as prevailing weather conditions.

"The deaths started occurring less than 2 weeks ago. We immediately
began our research in collaboration with the Polonnaruwa Veterinary
Research Officer to find out whether it was an epidemic," said
Thirukkovil Government Veterinary Surgeon Dr. Mrs. Thambamalar Gohulathash.

They had collected blood and foetal samples of the animals for check-ups.

"We have been able to come to the conclusion that the deaths were due
to the close herding of the animals," she added.

According to Dr. Gohulathash, farmers, although they had been advised
to do otherwise, have been herding the cattle in small land plots.

"Even though the number of animals was increasing, the farmers kept
on herding them in the same location," she said, pointing out that
this was not favourable for the health conditions of animals.

She also said acute contamination of water, neglecting the de-worming
process and the rapid environmental changes due to the heavy rains
and sudden drought that followed subsequently were other reasons
behind the deaths of cattle.

Meanwhile, South Dairy Development Co-operative Society dairy farmers
claim that more than 10 000 of their milking cattle have died and
that the deaths are the result of a disease to which the Animal
Production Department had no medication.

[Byline: Lakna Paranamanna and K.N. Tharmalingam]

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail

[For a map of Sri Lanka and the Ampara district, see map at
.

The attribution of this striking mass mortality, within less than 2
weeks, in (adult?) bovines to "progressive emaciation due to close
herding and prevailing weather conditions" needs to be substantiated.
The mentioning of "collection of foetal samples" may be indicative of
abortions. Is this correct? In order to be able to assess the
possible background to this grave event, there is need for data on
the number of farms involved, the age distribution and pregnancy
stages of the affected animals, possible common sources of their
feed, clinical investigations of their cohorts, findings of autopsies
and laboratory investigations, which should cover possible
infectious, parasitological, metabolic and toxicological factors. - Mod.AS]
...........................................sb/arn/msp/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
##########################################

FOOT & MOUTH DISEASE - CHINA: SUSPECTED, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

***********************************************
A ProMED-mail post

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases


Date: Thu 18 Mar 2010
Source: China Corn Market Net [trans., abridged Rapp.DS, edited]



Since there have recently been severe outbreaks of foot and mouth
disease [FMD] in Jilin, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, and Inner Mongolia,
there has been an impact on development of the livestock industry.
The Daqing area has been particularly hard hit, with severe losses of
dairy cows.

--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail Rapporteur Dan Silver

[The above translated excerpt of a local, Chinese corn market report
seems to be indicative of the actual situation of FMD in China.

China has reported to the OIE 3 outbreaks during 2010: A new outbreak
of FMDV serotype A in dairy cattle in a village in Daxing district,
Beijing, which reportedly was controlled by stamping out; and 2
outbreaks of FMDV serotype O, reported in early March 2010 (starting
in February) on 2 pig farms in Guangdong (one in Guangzhou, the 2nd
one in Shenzheng); both were reportedly controlled by stamping out.

During 2009, China reported 14 FMDV outbreaks which were declared
resolved. In November 2009, a notification of a new outbreak, caused
by FMDV serotype A, was sent to the OIE. It involved cattle in the
Changji Prefecture, Xinjiang and was followed by 2 additional
outbreaks in January 2010, similarly affecting cattle in Xinjiang:
one in Bayingolin Mongolia Autonomous Prefecture and the other one in
Baicheng county. This FMDV serotype A outbreak is currently defined
as "continuing;" (see
).

No information on cases in other provinces, including the ones
mentioned above, namely Jilin, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, and Inner
Mongolia, has become available during 2010. Since serotype O seems to
affect mainly swine, while serotype A seems to be bovine-adapted, it
may be assumed that the described outbreaks may have been caused, at
least in the Daqing area, by the latter; confirmatory information or
otherwise is requested. In case confirmed, details on the serotype
involved, species affected, measures applied and availability of
effective vaccine(s) are essential in a regional and international
context. - Mod.AS]

[see also:
Foot & mouth disease, swine - China: (GD), OIE 20100302.0693
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (03): (XJ), serotype A, RFI 20100208.0425
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (02): (BJ) OIE 20100123.0255
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China: (XJ) OIE, serotype A, RFI 20100115.0187
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - South Korea (02): serotype A 20100111.0130
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - South Korea: (KG), OIE 20100108.0089
2009
----
Foot & mouth disease - worldwide: 2009, update 20100109.0099
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (06): (XJ), OIE 20091128.4080
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (05): (SD) serotype A 20090609.2129
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (03): (HB, SH) serotype A 20090223.0757
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China (02): (SH) untyped 20090212.0629
Foot & mouth disease, bovine - China: (HB, A), (XJ, Asia1) 20090124.0318]
......................................................arn/msp/dk

*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that
are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held
responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Donate to ProMED-mail. Details available at:

************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at .
Send all items for posting to: promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to an individual moderator). If you do not give your
full name and affiliation, it may not be posted. Send
commands to subscribe/unsubscribe, get archives, help,
etc. to: majordomo@promedmail.org. For assistance from a
human being send mail to: owner-promed@promedmail.org.
############################################################
###########################################